nanog mailing list archives
Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:38:40 -0500
Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
(Yes, defense in depth is a Good Thing. But that external firewall isn't doing squat for your security if it actually accepts uPNP from inside.)
In this case we are referring to uPNP functionality at a LSN level. uPNP as it sits will not work at all, and security in this case refers not to the customer but to the ISP's router/server performing this service.
Jack
Current thread:
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?, (continued)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? William Herrin (Apr 21)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Mark Smith (Apr 29)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? isabel dias (Apr 29)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? William Herrin (Apr 29)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 29)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Simon Perreault (Apr 20)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Jack Bates (Apr 20)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 20)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Jack Bates (Apr 20)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Chris Adams (Apr 20)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Mikael Abrahamsson (Apr 20)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Chris Adams (Apr 20)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Jack Bates (Apr 20)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Chris Adams (Apr 21)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Owen DeLong (Apr 21)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Franck Martin (Apr 21)