nanog mailing list archives

Re: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses"

From: Ingo Flaschberger <if () xip at>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 23:01:34 +0200 (CEST)

Hey,

I should tell my customers that the cross sum of the domains ip
also count to the pagerank, and the ip 255.255.255.255 is the best of all.

bye,
        ingo flaschberger

Current thread:

Re: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses", (continued)
- - Re: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" Warren Kumari (Sep 22)
- Re: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" Leslie (Sep 21)
- Re: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" Jay Nakamura (Sep 22)
  - Re: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" Joe Greco (Sep 22)
- Re: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" Florian Weimer (Sep 22)
  - Re: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" Michael Holstein (Sep 22)
- RE: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" David Hubbard (Sep 21)
  - RE: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" david raistrick (Sep 21)
    - RE: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" david raistrick (Sep 21)
    - Re: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" Jeffrey Lyon (Sep 21)
    - Re: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" Ingo Flaschberger (Sep 21)
    - Re: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" Adrian Chadd (Sep 21)
    - Re: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 21)