nanog mailing list archives
Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP
From: Glen Kent <glen.kent () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 06:05:27 +0530
I seem to get the impression that isis is preferred in the core. Any reasons why folks dont prefer to go with ospf? Glen On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:
Unless you want your customers to have very substantial control over your internal network, don't use an SPF IGP like ospf or is-is.with your customer ^ i know that's what you meant, but i thought it worth making it very explicit. practice safe routing, do not share blood with customer. is-is in core with ibgp, and well-filtered ebgp (and packet filters a la bcp 38) to customers. randy
Current thread:
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Glen Kent (Sep 11)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Randy Bush (Sep 11)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Cord MacLeod (Sep 11)
- RE: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Fouant, Stefan (Sep 12)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Cord MacLeod (Sep 12)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Cord MacLeod (Sep 11)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Randy Bush (Sep 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Fouant, Stefan (Sep 11)