nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN


From: Perry Lorier <perry () coders net>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:20:04 +1300


What it does deprive them of, with increasing layers of NAT or proxy
service, is "dial-in" access.  Many do not require this feature.  The
cost of providing it is increased support costs; debugging two
networks and three or four protocols.  Today, even debugging IPv4
problems with customers is problematic and costly enough.

The WAND Networking Research group did some measurements on the number of clients that accepted at least one incoming TCP connection from external to their network and presented their results at NZNOG 2009 ( http://www.wand.net.nz/~salcock/nznog09/spnat-nznog.pdf ). The number of people that successfully accepted at least one incoming TCP connection was somewhere from 30% to 44%. Most of it seemed to be from people using bittorrent, but about half was from other protocols.

I'm not so sure it's entirely obvious that people aren't accepting incoming TCP connections.




Current thread: