nanog mailing list archives
Re: Maximum devices in OSPF area 0
From: Matthew Petach <mpetach () netflight com>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:46:59 -0700
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com
wrote:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Serge Vautour <sergevautour () yahoo ca> wrote:Hello, We are looking to deploy a greenfield MPLS network with OSPF as the IGP.I'm toldOSPF areas don't play well with OSPF TED. For this reason, we are lookingat using you said .. greenfield.. why use OSPF?
Yet another vote in favour of doing IS-IS if you're going to do a greenfield build; it'll make your IPv6 native rollout go *so* much more smoothly (and you *are* planning for IPv6 now, since it's a greenfield rollout, right? Matt
Current thread:
- Maximum devices in OSPF area 0 Serge Vautour (Oct 19)
- Re: Maximum devices in OSPF area 0 Richard A Steenbergen (Oct 19)
- Re: Maximum devices in OSPF area 0 Stefan Fouant (Oct 19)
- Re: Maximum devices in OSPF area 0 Christopher Morrow (Oct 19)
- Re: Maximum devices in OSPF area 0 sthaug (Oct 19)
- Re: Maximum devices in OSPF area 0 Matthew Petach (Oct 19)