nanog mailing list archives
Re: Maximum devices in OSPF area 0
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:52:15 -0400
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Serge Vautour <sergevautour () yahoo ca> wrote:
Hello, We are looking to deploy a greenfield MPLS network with OSPF as the IGP. I'm told OSPF areas don't play well with OSPF TED. For this reason, we are looking at using
you said .. greenfield.. why use OSPF?
only area 0. Only Loopback interfaces and p-p core ethernet links will be in OSPF. What are the maximum number of Routers & Links that folks would be comfortable with putting in 1 area? If folks are already using this type of approach, could you share your current numbers? Thanks, Serge __________________________________________________________________ Ask a question on any topic and get answers from real people. Go to Yahoo! Answers and share what you know at http://ca.answers.yahoo.com
Current thread:
- Maximum devices in OSPF area 0 Serge Vautour (Oct 19)
- Re: Maximum devices in OSPF area 0 Richard A Steenbergen (Oct 19)
- Re: Maximum devices in OSPF area 0 Stefan Fouant (Oct 19)
- Re: Maximum devices in OSPF area 0 Christopher Morrow (Oct 19)
- Re: Maximum devices in OSPF area 0 sthaug (Oct 19)
- Re: Maximum devices in OSPF area 0 Matthew Petach (Oct 19)