nanog mailing list archives
Re: ISP customer assignments
From: Rob Evans <internetplumber () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 11:46:58 +0100
This is a bit annoying though, yeah. But, I'm not sure I can think of a good solution that doesn't involve us changing the routing system so that we can handle a huge amount of intentional de-aggregates or something.
Within the RIPE region we're currently discussing a document on IPv6 route aggregation that acknowledges there are cases where it may be necessary to break up a /32 into a limited number of smaller blocks. Following discussion at the meeting last week I need to revise it, but the previous draft is here: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/maillists/archives/routing-wg/2009/msg00120.html Cheers, Rob
Current thread:
- Re: ISP customer assignments, (continued)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Chris Adams (Oct 13)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Leo Bicknell (Oct 13)
- RE: ISP customer assignments TJ (Oct 13)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Nathan Ward (Oct 13)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Chris Adams (Oct 13)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Nathan Ward (Oct 13)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Michael Dillon (Oct 15)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Chris Adams (Oct 15)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Nathan Ward (Oct 15)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Dave Temkin (Oct 15)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Rob Evans (Oct 16)
- Re: ISP customer assignments William Herrin (Oct 15)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Tore Anderson (Oct 16)
- RE: ISP customer assignments Wouter de Jong (Oct 14)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Joel Jaeggli (Oct 13)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Justin Shore (Oct 13)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Michael Dillon (Oct 13)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Bill Stewart (Oct 19)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Nathan Ward (Oct 19)
- Re: ISP customer assignments bmanning (Oct 19)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Nathan Ward (Oct 19)