nanog mailing list archives
Re: multicast nightmare #42 - REDUX
From: Philip Lavine <source_route () yahoo com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 09:52:08 -0700 (PDT)
More info if this helps: Switch Platform: 4500 SUPII+ with gig line cards Data rate is <100Mbps Server OS: Windows 2003 R2 (please withhold snickering). ----- Original Message ---- From: Philip Lavine <source_route () yahoo com> To: nanog <nanog () merit edu> Sent: Wed, October 14, 2009 8:19:51 AM Subject: multicast nightmare #42 Please explain how this would be possible: 1 sender 1 mcast group 1 receiver ---------------- = no data loss 1 sender 1 mcast group 2+ receivers on same VLAN and physical segment -------------------- = data loss
Current thread:
- multicast nightmare #42 Philip Lavine (Oct 14)
- RE: multicast nightmare #42 Forestal, Andre Jr. (Oct 14)
- Re: multicast nightmare #42 Adrian Minta (Oct 14)
- Re: multicast nightmare #42 Adrian Chadd (Oct 14)
- Re: multicast nightmare #42 - REDUX Philip Lavine (Oct 14)
- Re: multicast nightmare #42 - REDUX Adrian Minta (Oct 14)
- Re: multicast nightmare #42 - REDUX Benson Schliesser (Oct 14)
- Re: multicast nightmare #42 - REDUX Adrian Minta (Oct 14)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: multicast nightmare #42 Philip Lavine (Oct 15)
- RE: multicast nightmare #42 Michael K. Smith - Adhost (Oct 15)
- Message not available