nanog mailing list archives

Re: multicast nightmare #42

From: Adrian Minta <adrian.minta () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:44:22 +0300

Philip Lavine wrote:

Please explain how this would be possible:

1 sender
1 mcast group
1 receiver
----------------
 = no data loss

1 sender
1 mcast group
2+ receivers on same VLAN and physical segment
--------------------
= data loss

Probably a crappy switch.

--
Best regards,

Adrian Minta

Current thread:

multicast nightmare #42 Philip Lavine (Oct 14)
- RE: multicast nightmare #42 Forestal, Andre Jr. (Oct 14)
- Re: multicast nightmare #42 Adrian Minta (Oct 14)
  - Re: multicast nightmare #42 Adrian Chadd (Oct 14)
- Re: multicast nightmare #42 - REDUX Philip Lavine (Oct 14)
  - Re: multicast nightmare #42 - REDUX Adrian Minta (Oct 14)
    - Re: multicast nightmare #42 - REDUX Benson Schliesser (Oct 14)
- Message not available
  - Message not available
    - Message not available
    - Re: multicast nightmare #42 Philip Lavine (Oct 15)
    - RE: multicast nightmare #42 Michael K. Smith - Adhost (Oct 15)