nanog mailing list archives
Re: ISP customer assignments
From: eric clark <cabenth () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:24:18 -0700
So far, I have only dabbled with IPv6, but my reading of the RFCs is that VLSM for lengths beyond /64 is not required. Subsequently, to use anything longer is an enormous gamble in an enterprise environment. I envision upgrading code one day and finding that your /127 isn't supported any more and they forgot to mention it. I'll stick to /64, though it does seem a horrible waste of space. Someone else might have read the RFC differently though. Eric Clark
Current thread:
- Re: ISP customer assignments, (continued)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Mark Andrews (Oct 20)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Roland Dobbins (Oct 20)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Mark Andrews (Oct 20)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Roland Dobbins (Oct 20)
- Message not available
- Re: ISP customer assignments Tim Chown (Oct 21)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Ricky Beam (Oct 21)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Mark Andrews (Oct 21)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Justin Shore (Oct 13)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Chris Hills (Oct 13)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Michael Dillon (Oct 13)
- Re: ISP customer assignments eric clark (Oct 13)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Adam Armstrong (Oct 13)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Scott Morris (Oct 13)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Ricky Beam (Oct 13)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Mark Andrews (Oct 13)
- RE: ISP customer assignments TJ (Oct 13)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Adrian Chadd (Oct 13)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Nathan Ward (Oct 13)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Mark Andrews (Oct 13)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Nathan Ward (Oct 14)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Mark Andrews (Oct 14)