nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent leaking /32s?
From: ML <ml () kenweb org>
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 23:36:45 -0400
Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 10:54:13AM -0500, Clue Store wrote:Yes, I absolutely love the /24 filtering "everybody" does. Internet littering at its best. http://thyme.apnic.net/current/data-badpfx-nosThere is no rule that says you have to filter at /24, or that no other network may ever advertise something longer. This issue is probably best expressed as "you are highly unlikely to have full global Internet reachability if you announce something longer than a /24", not "you are highly unlikely to have anyone accept your announcement if it are longer than a /24".
Just to clarify it was a /32 for Cogent A/B peering. When I set it up they didn't recommend setting no-export.
Current thread:
- Cogent leaking /32s? ML (Oct 02)
- RE: Cogent leaking /32s? Zak Thompson (Oct 02)
- Re: Cogent leaking /32s? Joe Greco (Oct 02)
- Re: Cogent leaking /32s? Alex H. Ryu (Oct 02)
- Re: Cogent leaking /32s? Michael Hallgren (Oct 02)
- Re: Cogent leaking /32s? Mikael Abrahamsson (Oct 02)
- Re: Cogent leaking /32s? Clue Store (Oct 02)
- Re: Cogent leaking /32s? Michael Hallgren (Oct 02)
- Re: Cogent leaking /32s? Richard A Steenbergen (Oct 02)
- Re: Cogent leaking /32s? ML (Oct 02)
- Re: Cogent leaking /32s? Clue Store (Oct 02)
- RE: Cogent leaking /32s? Zak Thompson (Oct 02)
- Re: Cogent leaking /32s? seph (Oct 02)
- Re: Cogent leaking /32s? seph (Oct 02)