nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent leaking /32s?
From: Michael Hallgren <m.hallgren () free fr>
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 22:37:32 +0200
Le vendredi 02 octobre 2009 à 11:01 -0500, Alex H. Ryu a écrit :
If there is DDoS attack going on from/to specific /32, sometimes they do that to avoid too much overload for the network. Cogent should give the answer for what's going on.
Generally, such is kept in-AS (null-routing or routing to some other sink of choice). mh
Alex Zak Thompson wrote:We had a problem with cogent about a year ago. Somehow.. cymru was announcing a /32 of ours and black holing it for whatever reason. It was removed but wasn't happy that cogent was allowing cymru to do this sort of action. To this date we do not have a valid reason from cogent on why they allowed this to happen. Cheers, Zak Thompson -----Original Message----- From: ML [mailto:ml () kenweb org] Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 7:23 AM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Cogent leaking /32s? I received an alert from Cyclops telling me a probe in AS513 had seen a /32 that I announce to Cogent for one of our BGP sessions. Did anyone else see this?
-- michael hallgren, mh2198-ripe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
Current thread:
- Cogent leaking /32s? ML (Oct 02)
- RE: Cogent leaking /32s? Zak Thompson (Oct 02)
- Re: Cogent leaking /32s? Joe Greco (Oct 02)
- Re: Cogent leaking /32s? Alex H. Ryu (Oct 02)
- Re: Cogent leaking /32s? Michael Hallgren (Oct 02)
- Re: Cogent leaking /32s? Mikael Abrahamsson (Oct 02)
- Re: Cogent leaking /32s? Clue Store (Oct 02)
- Re: Cogent leaking /32s? Michael Hallgren (Oct 02)
- Re: Cogent leaking /32s? Richard A Steenbergen (Oct 02)
- Re: Cogent leaking /32s? ML (Oct 02)
- Re: Cogent leaking /32s? Clue Store (Oct 02)
- RE: Cogent leaking /32s? Zak Thompson (Oct 02)
- Re: Cogent leaking /32s? seph (Oct 02)
- Re: Cogent leaking /32s? seph (Oct 02)