nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 internet broken, Verizon route prefix length policy
From: Mark Andrews <marka () isc org>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:40:47 +1100
In message <4AD382E4.9010901 () iglou com>, Jeff McAdams writes:
Seth Mattinen wrote:If you are interested, I don't want to spam the list with my Verizon horror story, but you can read it here: http://www.rollernet.us/wordpress/category/ipv6/At the risk of sounding like I'm piling on, I'm in the same basically the same boat that Seth is, except that I do know who my account rep is and have been in touch with him. Verizon's policy has been related to me that they will not accept or propogate any IPv6 route advertisements with prefix lengths longer than /32. Full stop. So that even includes those of us that have /48 PI space from ARIN that are direct customers of Verizon.
Looks like Verizon doesn't want any IPv6 customers. If a company has idiotic policies like this vote with your wallet.
I've been told that Verizon is discussing this policy and whether it should be updated, but until they update their policy to be in line with the IPv6 Internet allocation/assignment policies from at least September of 2006 (when ARIN assigned their first /48 from 2620:0::/23), if your announcements are only longer than /32, you should be aware that Verizon is completely unreachable for you - even if you are a Verizon customer directly. -- Jeff McAdams
-- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka () isc org
Current thread:
- Re: Is v6 as important as v4? Of course not [was: IPv6 internet broken, cogent/telia/hurricane not peering], (continued)
- Re: Is v6 as important as v4? Of course not [was: IPv6 internet broken, cogent/telia/hurricane not peering] Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 14)
- Re: Is v6 as important as v4? Of course not [was: IPv6 internet broken, cogent/telia/hurricane not peering] Randy Bush (Oct 14)
- Re: Is v6 as important as v4? Of course not [was: IPv6 internet broken, cogent/telia/hurricane not peering] Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 14)
- Re: Is v6 as important as v4? Of course not [was: IPv6 internet broken, cogent/telia/hurricane not peering] Phil Regnauld (Oct 14)
- Re: Is v6 as important as v4? Of course not [was: IPv6 internet broken, cogent/telia/hurricane not peering] Randy Bush (Oct 14)
- Re: Is v6 as important as v4? Of course not [was: IPv6 internet broken, cogent/telia/hurricane not peering] Dave Temkin (Oct 14)
- Re: Is v6 as important as v4? Of course not [was: IPv6 internet broken, cogent/telia/hurricane not peering] Mike Leber (Oct 14)
- Re: Is v6 as important as v4? Of course not [was: IPv6 internet broken, cogent/telia/hurricane not peering] Charles Wyble (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 internet broken, Verizon route prefix length policy Jeff McAdams (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 internet broken, Verizon route prefix length policy Mark Andrews (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 internet broken, Verizon route prefix length policy Bret Clark (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 internet broken, Verizon route prefix length policy Mark Andrews (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 internet broken, Verizon route prefix length policy Seth Mattinen (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 internet broken, Verizon route prefix length policy David Conrad (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 internet broken, Verizon route prefix length policy Owen DeLong (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 internet broken, Verizon route prefix length policy David Conrad (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 internet broken, Verizon route prefix length policy Christopher Morrow (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 internet broken, Verizon route prefix length policy Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 internet broken, Verizon route prefix length policy Adrian Chadd (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 internet broken, Verizon route prefix length policy Kevin Loch (Oct 12)