nanog mailing list archives
Re: Upstream BGP community support
From: Dorian Kim <dorian () blackrose org>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:35:31 -0500
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 06:27:38PM -0500, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
1) Old stodgy tier 1's who have communities but don't want to share them with the world, because of silly NDA concerns or the like. This covers a
I'm curious, since when did respecting bounds of contracts and agreements one has signed become "stodgy"? -dorian
Current thread:
- Re: Upstream BGP community support, (continued)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Jeffrey Lyon (Oct 31)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Richard A Steenbergen (Oct 31)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Andy B. (Oct 31)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Christopher Morrow (Oct 31)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Randy Bush (Oct 31)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support jim deleskie (Oct 31)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Randy Bush (Oct 31)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support jim deleskie (Oct 31)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Andy B. (Oct 31)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Paul Wall (Oct 31)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Richard A Steenbergen (Oct 31)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Dorian Kim (Oct 31)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Richard A Steenbergen (Oct 31)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Dorian Kim (Oct 31)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Richard A Steenbergen (Oct 31)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Richard A Steenbergen (Oct 31)
- Message not available
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Andy B. (Oct 31)