nanog mailing list archives
Re: White House net security paper
From: Paul Vixie <vixie () isc org>
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 05:12:25 +0000
Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com> writes:
How many ISPs have too many network security people?
network security is a "loss center". not just a cost center, a *loss* center. non-bankrupt ISP's whose investors will make good multiples only staff their *profit* centers. the Good Guys and Bad Guys all know this -- the difference is that the Good Guys try not to think about this whereas the Bad Guys think about it all the time. -- Paul Vixie KI6YSY
Current thread:
- Re: White House net security paper, (continued)
- Re: White House net security paper Andrew Euell (May 29)
- Re: White House net security paper Jared Mauch (May 29)
- Re: White House net security paper Andrew Euell (May 29)
- Re: White House net security paper marcin (May 29)
- Re: White House net security paper Andrew Euell (May 31)
- Re: White House net security paper Sean Donelan (May 31)
- Re: White House net security paper Randy Bush (May 31)
- Re: White House net security paper Adrian Chadd (May 31)
- Re: White House net security paper Randy Bush (May 31)
- Re: White House net security paper Paul Vixie (May 31)
- Re: White House net security paper Sean Donelan (May 31)
- Re: White House net security paper Barney Wolff (May 31)
- Re: White House net security paper Paul Vixie (May 31)