nanog mailing list archives
Re: White House net security paper
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 13:08:05 +0900
and why do we think that throwing a jillion bodies at the problem is a useful approach?No, but it does keep people employed.
As hire As. Bs hire Cs. Lots of Cs. this problem needs neurons, not battalions. randy
Current thread:
- White House net security paper jamie rishaw (May 29)
- Re: White House net security paper bmanning (May 29)
- Re: White House net security paper Andrew Euell (May 29)
- Re: White House net security paper Jared Mauch (May 29)
- Re: White House net security paper Andrew Euell (May 29)
- Re: White House net security paper marcin (May 29)
- Re: White House net security paper Andrew Euell (May 31)
- Re: White House net security paper Sean Donelan (May 31)
- Re: White House net security paper Randy Bush (May 31)
- Re: White House net security paper Adrian Chadd (May 31)
- Re: White House net security paper Randy Bush (May 31)
- Re: White House net security paper Paul Vixie (May 31)
- Re: White House net security paper Sean Donelan (May 31)
- Re: White House net security paper bmanning (May 29)
- Re: White House net security paper Barney Wolff (May 31)
- Re: White House net security paper Paul Vixie (May 31)