Re: AH or ESP

[Nathan Ward <nanog () daork net>]

On 27/05/2009, at 8:11 AM, Roland Dobbins wrote:

> On May 27, 2009, at 3:00 AM, Tony Hain wrote:
>
> > Just because you can't use it for IPv4 is no reason to avoid using  
> > it for IPv6 now and let its momentum suppress the 66CGN walled  
> > garden mindset.
>
> I concur quite strongly with your views on this particular topic,  
> but the CGN boat appears to've sailed, AFAICT.


Note that Tony is talking about 6-to-6 NAT, not 6-to-4 NAT or vice  
versa (not to be confused with 6to4 tunnelling).

I'm not sure that boat has sailed yet.

--
Nathan Ward