nanog mailing list archives
Re: AH or ESP
From: Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 03:11:30 +0700
On May 27, 2009, at 3:00 AM, Tony Hain wrote:
Just because you can't use it for IPv4 is no reason to avoid using it for IPv6 now and let its momentum suppress the 66CGN walled garden mindset.
I concur quite strongly with your views on this particular topic, but the CGN boat appears to've sailed, AFAICT.
----------------------------------------------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com> Unfortunately, inefficiency scales really well. -- Kevin Lawton
Current thread:
- Re: AH or ESP, (continued)
- Re: AH or ESP Glen Kent (May 22)
- Re: AH or ESP Jack Kohn (May 25)
- Re: AH or ESP Merike Kaeo (May 25)
- Re: AH or ESP Jack Kohn (May 25)
- Re: AH or ESP Glen Kent (May 25)
- Re: AH or ESP Merike Kaeo (May 25)
- Re: AH or ESP Jack Kohn (May 25)
- Re: AH or ESP Merike Kaeo (May 25)
- Re: AH or ESP Randy Bush (May 26)
- RE: AH or ESP Tony Hain (May 26)
- Re: AH or ESP Roland Dobbins (May 26)
- Re: AH or ESP Nathan Ward (May 26)
- Re: AH or ESP Dave Israel (May 26)
- Re: AH or ESP Jack Kohn (May 26)
- Re: AH or ESP Merike Kaeo (May 26)
- Re: AH or ESP Merike Kaeo (May 25)