nanog mailing list archives

Re: Multi-homed clients and BGP timers

From: Florian Weimer <fw () deneb enyo de>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 19:33:26 +0200

* Iljitsch van Beijnum:

30 60 isn't a good choice because that means that after 30.1 seconds a
keepalive comes in and then after 60.0 seconds the session will expire
while the second one would be there in 60.1 seconds.


Wouldn't the underlying TCP retry sooner than that?

Current thread:

Re: Multi-homed clients and BGP timers, (continued)
- - Re: Multi-homed clients and BGP timers Steve Bertrand (May 22)
    - Re: Multi-homed clients and BGP timers Danny McPherson (May 22)
    - RE: Multi-homed clients and BGP timers Deepak Jain (May 22)
    - Re: Multi-homed clients and BGP timers Steve Bertrand (May 22)
    - Re: Multi-homed clients and BGP timers Jack Bates (May 22)
    - Re: Multi-homed clients and BGP timers Steve Bertrand (May 22)
    - RE: Multi-homed clients and BGP timers Ivan Pepelnjak (May 23)
    - RE: Multi-homed clients and BGP timers Frank Bulk (May 24)
    - RE: Multi-homed clients and BGP timers Ivan Pepelnjak (May 23)
  - Re: Multi-homed clients and BGP timers Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 23)
    - Re: Multi-homed clients and BGP timers Florian Weimer (May 25)
    - Re: Multi-homed clients and BGP timers Danny McPherson (May 25)
    - Re: Multi-homed clients and BGP timers Florian Weimer (May 25)
- Re: Multi-homed clients and BGP timers Olof Kasselstrand (May 25)
  - IXP BGP timers (was: Multi-homed clients and BGP timers) Chris Caputo (May 25)
    - Re: IXP BGP timers (was: Multi-homed clients and BGP timers) Andree Toonk (May 25)
    - RE: IXP BGP timers (was: Multi-homed clients and BGP timers) John.Herbert (May 25)
- Re: Multi-homed clients and BGP timers Steve Bertrand (May 26)