nanog mailing list archives
Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden]
From: Mans Nilsson <mansaxel () besserwisser org>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 15:52:08 +0200
Subject: Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Date: Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:10:26AM +0100 Quoting John R. Levine (johnl () iecc com):
And what's the next protocol that is going to be stomped on?Anything except http; at which point everything will move to http, and the firewalls are again useless.Um, if you think that http on consumer networks is transparent, I have some really bad news for you.
If you change my sentence thusly: s/http/ what can be communicated over http/1;s/http/said channel/2; ..it all makes sense again, even "better" than before. -- Måns Nilsson
Current thread:
- Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden], (continued)
- Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Marshall Eubanks (May 14)
- Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Mark Andrews (May 14)
- RE: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Tomas L. Byrnes (May 14)
- Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Mark Andrews (May 14)
- Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Patrick W. Gilmore (May 16)
- Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] George Imburgia (May 17)
- Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Patrick W. Gilmore (May 17)
- Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Andre Gironda (May 14)
- Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Mans Nilsson (May 14)
- Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] John R. Levine (May 15)
- Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Mans Nilsson (May 15)
- Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Owen DeLong (May 15)
- Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Martin Hannigan (May 15)
- Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Andrew D Kirch (May 14)
- Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Robert E. Seastrom (May 15)