nanog mailing list archives
Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden]
From: "John R. Levine" <johnl () iecc com>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 10:10:26 +0100 (BST)
And what's the next protocol that is going to be stomped on?Anything except http; at which point everything will move to http, and the firewalls are again useless.
Um, if you think that http on consumer networks is transparent, I have some really bad news for you.
Regards, John Levine, johnl () iecc com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://www.johnlevine.com, ex-Mayor "More Wiener schnitzel, please", said Tom, revealingly.
Current thread:
- RE: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden], (continued)
- RE: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Dave Larter (May 14)
- Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Marshall Eubanks (May 14)
- Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Mark Andrews (May 14)
- RE: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Tomas L. Byrnes (May 14)
- Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Mark Andrews (May 14)
- Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Patrick W. Gilmore (May 16)
- Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] George Imburgia (May 17)
- Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Patrick W. Gilmore (May 17)
- RE: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Dave Larter (May 14)
- Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Andre Gironda (May 14)
- Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Mans Nilsson (May 14)
- Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] John R. Levine (May 15)
- Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Mans Nilsson (May 15)
- Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Owen DeLong (May 15)
- Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Martin Hannigan (May 15)
- Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Andrew D Kirch (May 14)
- Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Robert E. Seastrom (May 15)