nanog mailing list archives
RE: Google Over IPV6
From: Teun Vink <teun () moonblade net>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 11:40:31 +0200
On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 11:03 -0400, Robert D. Scott wrote:
Their press would indicate that more than www is IPV6. When I posted my original note, I was not really looking for end user feedback, but rather is anyone peering V6 with them on either a public fabric or private peer. Any idea if they have native V6 transit, or are tunneling, and to where.
Yes, for example reader, maps, picasa and gmail have IPv6 enabled as well. Groups, youtube and orkut don't have IPv6 enabled, it seems. Funny thing to see is that IPv6 latency is lower than the IPv4 latency: --- www.l.google.com ping6 statistics --- 54 packets transmitted, 54 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/std-dev = 8.302/9.038/12.639/0.989 ms --- www.l.google.com ping statistics --- 57 packets transmitted, 57 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 13.780/15.739/35.764/4.055 ms Regards, Teun
Current thread:
- RE: Google Over IPV6, (continued)
- RE: Google Over IPV6 Robert D. Scott (Mar 27)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Grzegorz Janoszka (Mar 27)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Rob Evans (Mar 27)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Leo Bicknell (Mar 27)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Nick Hilliard (Mar 27)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Joel Jaeggli (Mar 31)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Matthew Moyle-Croft (Mar 31)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Florian Weimer (Mar 27)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Nathan Ward (Mar 27)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Kevin Oberman (Mar 27)
- RE: Google Over IPV6 Teun Vink (Mar 30)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Bernhard Schmidt (Mar 28)