nanog mailing list archives
Re: Google Over IPV6
From: Grzegorz Janoszka <Grzegorz () Janoszka pl>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 16:07:36 +0100
Robert D. Scott wrote:
When I posted my original note, I was not really looking for end user feedback, but rather is anyone peering V6 with them on either a public fabric or private peer. Any idea if they have native V6 transit, or are tunneling, and to where.
No tuneling I think. We have with them several peerings, IPv6 native together with IPv4.
-- Grzegorz Janoszka
Current thread:
- Re: Google Over IPV6, (continued)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Steve Bertrand (Mar 27)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Nuno Vieira - nfsi telecom (Mar 27)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Daniel Verlouw (Mar 27)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Shaun Ewing (Mar 27)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Steven M. Bellovin (Mar 27)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Daniel Verlouw (Mar 27)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Steven M. Bellovin (Mar 27)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Charles Wyble (Mar 27)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Shaun Ewing (Mar 27)
- RE: Google Over IPV6 Robert D. Scott (Mar 27)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Grzegorz Janoszka (Mar 27)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Rob Evans (Mar 27)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Leo Bicknell (Mar 27)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Nick Hilliard (Mar 27)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Joel Jaeggli (Mar 31)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Matthew Moyle-Croft (Mar 31)