nanog mailing list archives
Re: Akamai wierdness
From: JC Dill <jcdill.lists () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:03:28 -0700
Paul Wall wrote:
Patrick Gilmore wrote [context inserted]:Perhaps using the RFC required address [noc@akamai] would be moreproductive than e-mailing 10k strangers? Normally I see emails like this and, if it's Not In My Back Yard, and the Internet is not going nutz, the delete key explains how worried i am. Back to your email:using the RFC required addressThe correct catty response to the Akamai question is : ccare () akamai com. That's C as in "Customer", Care as in "they actually care". I would end the email there, but it really gets me how someone that is in-house doesn't realize that noc@akamai is a black hole.
Paul, you might want to test a theory of this nature before you post about it to more than a thousand of your colleagues. This morning I sent email to noc () akamai com and received a personalized (non-autoresponder) reply 17 minutes later.
jc
Current thread:
- Akamai wierdness John Palmer (NANOG Acct) (Mar 22)
- RE: Akamai wierdness Paul Stewart (Mar 22)
- Re: Akamai wierdness John Palmer (NANOG Acct) (Mar 22)
- Re: Akamai wierdness Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 22)
- Re: Akamai wierdness Paul Wall (Mar 23)
- Re: Akamai wierdness JC Dill (Mar 23)
- RE: Akamai wierdness Paul Stewart (Mar 23)
- Re: Akamai wierdness Charles Wyble (Mar 23)
- Re: Akamai wierdness John Palmer (NANOG Acct) (Mar 22)
- Re: Akamai wierdness Paul Wall (Mar 23)
- Re: Akamai wierdness JC Dill (Mar 24)
- Re: Akamai wierdness Paul Wall (Mar 24)
- Re: Akamai wierdness jamie rishaw (Mar 24)
- Re: Akamai wierdness JC Dill (Mar 24)
- RE: Akamai wierdness Paul Stewart (Mar 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Akamai wierdness Jeffrey Cohen (Mar 25)
- Re: Akamai wierdness JC Dill (Mar 25)