nanog mailing list archives

Re: Akamai wierdness


From: JC Dill <jcdill.lists () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:03:28 -0700

Paul Wall wrote:
Patrick Gilmore wrote [context inserted]:
Perhaps using the RFC required address [noc@akamai] would be more
productive than e-mailing 10k strangers?

Normally I see emails like this and, if it's Not In My Back Yard, and the
Internet is not going nutz, the delete key explains how worried i am.

Back to your email:

using the RFC required address

The correct catty response to the Akamai question is : ccare () akamai com.
 That's C as in "Customer", Care as in "they actually care".

I would end the email there, but it really gets me how someone that is
in-house doesn't realize that noc@akamai is a black hole.

Paul, you might want to test a theory of this nature before you post about it to more than a thousand of your colleagues. This morning I sent email to noc () akamai com and received a personalized (non-autoresponder) reply 17 minutes later.

jc




Current thread: