nanog mailing list archives
RE: Fiber cut - response in seconds?
From: Deepak Jain <deepak () ai net>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 18:32:01 -0400
Once upon a time, Deepak Jain <deepak () ai net> said:Which is why, if you have a satellite, you often position DIRECTLY over the antenna you are sending toUnless your target is on the equator, you don't position a satellite directly over anything.
I promise you that that is not the case for all applications. Geosynchronous satellites can be anywhere. For the applications you are considering (communications mostly), equatorial orbit is the most advantageous. There are books documenting other locations and reasons for other locations... and we are off topic. Best, Deepak Jain AiNET
Current thread:
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds?, (continued)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Warren Bailey (Jun 01)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? David Barak (Jun 02)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Charles Wyble (Jun 02)
- RE: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Deepak Jain (Jun 02)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Charles Wyble (Jun 02)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? David Barak (Jun 02)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Charles Wyble (Jun 02)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Marshall Eubanks (Jun 02)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Michael Holstein (Jun 02)
- RE: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Deepak Jain (Jun 02)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Chris Adams (Jun 02)
- RE: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Deepak Jain (Jun 02)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Chris Adams (Jun 02)
- RE: Fiber cut - response in seconds? John van Oppen (Jun 02)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Charles Wyble (Jun 02)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Ryan Wilkins (Jun 02)