nanog mailing list archives

RE: Use of Default in the DFZ: banned in philly, see it now on the net!


From: "Michael K. Smith - Adhost" <mksmith () adhost com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 11:18:32 -0700

That was my assumption when I checked the "UCLA is wrong" button on the
form.  We only have one downstream, but it's a distinct ASN so that says
"not stub" to me.

Mike

Randy top posting - will wonders never cease.

-----Original Message-----
From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy () psg com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 10:58 AM
To: Ricardo Oliveira
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: Use of Default in the DFZ: banned in philly,see it now on
the net!

OK,a buckety of salt.

 From my pov, a stub has zero downstreams.

randy, on iPhone

On Jun 24, 2009, at 10:39, Ricardo Oliveira <rveloso () cs ucla edu>
wrote:

Jack,
Please give me your ASN and i'll double check our data. As long as
the network has 4 or less downstreams, it's  being labeled as
"stub".
More details here:
http://www.cs.ucla.edu/~rveloso/papers/completeness-ton.pdf

Thanks,

--Ricardo

On Jun 24, 2009, at 6:44 AM, Jack Bates wrote:

Randy Bush wrote:
please do check your as at <http://psg.com/default/> and then
actually
look at your router config.  i found one of my routers still had a
default from when i was bringing it up.

Ick. Nothing was right. Reported as mixed, though that may be my
fault and not your testing. Hmmm. Or your test didn't take some
things into account like changes over time. Normally I keep a
default route available, but due to changing IGP internally I
actually have a default which points interior from the edge
routers. So when I shut down the last BGP session on the old cisco,
the defaults to the transits went away.

Was also reported as a stub. Glad to know that I don't have BGP
customers. Oh, wait, I do. :)


Jack




Current thread: