nanog mailing list archives
Re: spamhaus drop list
From: Chris Adams <cmadams () hiwaay net>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:18:54 -0500
Once upon a time, Fred Baker <fred () cisco com> said:
On Jun 15, 2009, at 1:16 PM, Quinn Mahoney wrote:Or use this script which null routes the traffic (I guess it's not a big deal getting the syn packets, as long as the mail won't send because of the null route)I you are using uRPF, the SYN packets won't get through either, because they came from an interface other than the null interface. Not so helpful interddomain, but it protects your customers from each other (as BCP 38 does in other cases).
Not true for JUNOS; "discard" routes are still in the forwarding table and are treated as a valid destination when it comes to loose-mode uRPF. -- Chris Adams <cmadams () hiwaay net> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
Current thread:
- spamhaus drop list Quinn Mahoney (Jun 15)
- Re: spamhaus drop list Fred Baker (Jun 15)
- Re: spamhaus drop list Chris Adams (Jun 15)
- Message not available
- RE: spamhaus drop list Quinn Mahoney (Jun 16)
- Re: spamhaus drop list sthaug (Jun 16)
- Re: spamhaus drop list Peter Dambier (Jun 16)
- Re: spamhaus drop list Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 16)
- Re: spamhaus drop list Peter Dambier (Jun 16)
- Re: spamhaus drop list Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 16)
- Re: spamhaus drop list J.D. Falk (Jun 17)
- RE: spamhaus drop list Quinn Mahoney (Jun 16)
- Re: spamhaus drop list John Levine (Jun 16)
- Re: spamhaus drop list Bret Clark (Jun 16)
- Re: spamhaus drop list Rich Kulawiec (Jun 18)
- Re: spamhaus drop list Fred Baker (Jun 15)