nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent input
From: Brad Fleming <bdfleming () kanren net>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:59:09 -0500
On Jun 11, 2009, at 9:33 AM, Stephen Kratzer wrote:
The biggest issue we have with them is that they don't allowdeaggregation. If you've been allocated a prefix of length yy, they'll acceptonly x.x.x.x/yy, not x.x.x.x/yy le 24. Yes, sometimes deaggregation is necessary or desirable even if only temporarily.
In our peering session with Cogent, we requested several /16 le /24 prefixes configured and received no pushback or problems. We are using their 1Gbps service so I'm not sure if that buys us additional leeway with requests like this or not. We've been customers for nearly two full years and intend to continue for at least a third.
-brad fleming
Current thread:
- Re: Cogent input, (continued)
- Re: Cogent input L K (Jun 18)
- Re: Cogent input German Martinez (Jun 14)
- IPv6 transits (Was: Cogent input) Jeroen Massar (Jun 14)
- Re: IPv6 transits (Was: Cogent input) Robert Blayzor (Jun 18)
- Re: IPv6 transits (Was: Cogent input) Nuno Vieira - nfsi telecom (Jun 18)
- Re: IPv6 transits sthaug (Jun 18)
- Re: IPv6 transits Tomas Caslavsky (Jun 18)
- Re: Cogent input Justin Shore (Jun 12)
- Re: Cogent input Seth Mattinen (Jun 16)
- Re: Cogent input Dan Carley (Jun 17)
- Re: Cogent input German Martinez (Jun 14)
- Re: Cogent input Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 15)
- Hurricane Electric Paul Stewart (Jun 17)
- Re: Hurricane Electric David Klann (Jun 17)
- Re: Hurricane Electric Paul Ferguson (Jun 17)
- Re: Hurricane Electric Tico (Jun 17)