nanog mailing list archives
Re: Wireless bridge
From: Matthew Kaufman <matthew () eeph com>
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2009 09:14:35 -0700
Matthew Walster wrote:
I'd heartily recommend giving infra-red FSO a go, no Fresnel zone...
A nitpick, but there's nothing special about infra-red that makes it not electromagnetic just like microwave. So there's still a Fresnel zone, only smaller in diameter.
Also for this kind of link, 60 GHz gear is often cheaper and easier to deal with, so what I would recommend.
Matthew Kaufman
Current thread:
- Re: Wireless bridge Matthew Walster (Jul 03)
- Re: Wireless bridge Matthew Kaufman (Jul 03)
- Re: Wireless bridge Jorge Amodio (Jul 03)
- Re: Wireless bridge Joel Jaeggli (Jul 03)
- Re: Wireless bridge Jorge Amodio (Jul 03)
- Re: Wireless bridge Matthew Kaufman (Jul 03)