nanog mailing list archives
Re: Looking for verification that Google and Akamai have the geo-ip for 96.31.0.0/20 set correctly
From: Chris Hills <chaz () chaz6 com>
Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2009 12:44:49 +0100
On 03/01/09 07:31, Martin Hannigan wrote:
Overall, geo location has turned out to be a somewhat valuable tool in terms of language, fraud, and localization. I think that it's important to continue to urge improvements in this technology, not divestment.
Is it really that difficult to check the Accept-Language header for determining the language to use? This is particularly useful in countries that either have no official language, countries that have more than one official language, and tourists.
Current thread:
- Looking for verification that Google and Akamai have the geo-ip for 96.31.0.0/20 set correctly Frank Bulk - iName.com (Jan 02)
- Re: Looking for verification that Google and Akamai have the geo-ip for 96.31.0.0/20 set correctly Martin Hannigan (Jan 02)
- Re: Looking for verification that Google and Akamai have the geo-ip for 96.31.0.0/20 set correctly Mark Foster (Jan 02)
- Re: Looking for verification that Google and Akamai have the geo-ip for 96.31.0.0/20 set correctly Neil (Jan 02)
- Re: Looking for verification that Google and Akamai have the geo-ip for 96.31.0.0/20 set correctly Martin Hannigan (Jan 02)
- Re: Looking for verification that Google and Akamai have the geo-ip for 96.31.0.0/20 set correctly Chris Hills (Jan 03)
- Re: Looking for verification that Google and Akamai have the geo-ip for 96.31.0.0/20 set correctly Martin Hannigan (Jan 03)
- Re: Looking for verification that Google and Akamai have the geo-ip for 96.31.0.0/20 set correctly Greg Skinner (Jan 04)
- Re: Looking for verification that Google and Akamai have the geo-ip for 96.31.0.0/20 set correctly Mark Foster (Jan 02)
- Re: Looking for verification that Google and Akamai have the geo-ip for 96.31.0.0/20 set correctly Martin Hannigan (Jan 02)