Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless

[Aaron Glenn <aaron.glenn () gmail com>]

On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Jeffrey Lyon
<jeffrey.lyon () blacklotus net> wrote:
> Whatever happened to NAT?
>
> Jeff

NAT? why isn't Verizon 'It's the Network' Wireless using IPv6?
<speaking-from-ass>there should be a FOIA-like method to see large
allocation justifications</ass>