nanog mailing list archives
Re: DNS question, null MX records
From: Paul Vixie <vixie () isc org>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:48:00 +0000
Douglas Otis <dotis () mail-abuse org> writes:
If MX TEST-NET became common, legitimate email handlers unable to validate messages prior to acceptance might find their server resource constrained when bouncing a large amount of spam as well.
none of this will block spam. spammers do not follow RFC 974 today (since i see a lot of them come to my A RR rather than an MX RR, or in the wrong order). any well known pattern that says "don't try to deliver e-mail here" will only be honoured by friend people who don't want us to get e-mail we don't want to get. -- Paul Vixie KI6YSY
Current thread:
- Re: DNS question, null MX records, (continued)
- Re: DNS question, null MX records Dave Sparro (Dec 15)
- Re: DNS question, null MX records Joe Abley (Dec 16)
- RE: DNS question, null MX records Eric J Esslinger (Dec 15)
- Re: DNS question, null MX records Andy Davidson (Dec 15)
- Re: DNS question, null MX records Douglas Otis (Dec 15)
- Re: DNS question, null MX records Mark Andrews (Dec 15)
- Re: DNS question, null MX records Tony Finch (Dec 16)
- Re: DNS question, null MX records Douglas Otis (Dec 16)
- Re: DNS question, null MX records Joe Abley (Dec 16)
- Re: DNS question, null MX records Douglas Otis (Dec 16)
- Re: DNS question, null MX records Paul Vixie (Dec 16)
- Re: DNS question, null MX records Douglas Otis (Dec 16)
- Re: DNS question, null MX records Paul Vixie (Dec 16)
- RE: DNS question, null MX records Jay Mitchell (Dec 18)
- Re: DNS question, null MX records Douglas Otis (Dec 15)
- Re: DNS question, null MX records Dave Sparro (Dec 15)
- Re: DNS question, null MX records Tony Finch (Dec 17)
- Re: DNS question, null MX records Douglas Otis (Dec 17)
- Re: DNS question, null MX records James Hess (Dec 17)
- Re: DNS question, null MX records Mark Andrews (Dec 17)
- Re: DNS question, null MX records Tony Finch (Dec 18)
- Re: DNS question, null MX records *summary of on list and off list replies* Phil Vandry (Dec 15)