nanog mailing list archives
Re: DNS question, null MX records
From: Tony Finch <dot () dotat at>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 11:59:18 +0000
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Mark Andrews wrote:
Douglas Otis wrote:One might instead consider using: example.com. IN MX 0 192.0.2.0 IN MX 10 192.0.2.1 ... IN MX 90 192.0.2.9Which will expand to: example.com. IN MX 0 192.0.2.0.example.com. IN MX 10 192.0.2.1.example.com. .... IN MX 90 192.0.2.9.example.com. MX records DO NOT take IP addresses.
Or if he puts in the trailing dot it'll still cause the root server traffic he was trying to avoid. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <dot () dotat at> http://dotat.at/ GERMAN BIGHT HUMBER: SOUTHWEST 5 TO 7. MODERATE OR ROUGH. SQUALLY SHOWERS. MODERATE OR GOOD.
Current thread:
- Re: DNS question, null MX records, (continued)
- Re: DNS question, null MX records Mark Andrews (Dec 16)
- RE: DNS question, null MX records Brian Dickson (Dec 16)
- Re: DNS question, null MX records Joe Abley (Dec 16)
- Re: DNS question, null MX records Joe Abley (Dec 16)
- Re: DNS question, null MX records Douglas Otis (Dec 15)
- Re: DNS question, null MX records Mark Andrews (Dec 15)
- Re: DNS question, null MX records Tony Finch (Dec 16)
- Re: DNS question, null MX records Douglas Otis (Dec 16)
- Re: DNS question, null MX records Joe Abley (Dec 16)
- Re: DNS question, null MX records Douglas Otis (Dec 16)
- Re: DNS question, null MX records Paul Vixie (Dec 16)
- Re: DNS question, null MX records Douglas Otis (Dec 16)
- Re: DNS question, null MX records Paul Vixie (Dec 16)
- RE: DNS question, null MX records Jay Mitchell (Dec 18)