Re: Arrogant RBL list maintainers

[Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>]

Matthew Petach wrote:
> Take a look at the reverse DNS for the entire 66.163.178.0/23 subnet;
> you'll find that when you're doing things at large scale, you can't really
> get away from having sequentially numbered reverse DNS entries all
> in a row, exactly as you seem to think "Nobody has".  :/

Of course not. Everyone is small like me. Having more than 10 mail 
servers? How dare you use incremental numbers on such a large scale!

Jack