nanog mailing list archives

Re: Arrogant RBL list maintainers


From: Matthew Petach <mpetach () netflight com>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 09:21:42 -0800

On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 5:21 AM,  <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 07:06:55 EST, Mike Lieman said:

What's the word for 'mail server' in Lower Sorbian, and does your algorithm
properly detect it in a hostname?  See the problem here?

When the hostname at that IP address is exactly one incremented character
different than the preceding address, and one decremented character different
than the following address, and that pattern holds across a /24, they're
probably not mail servers.  Nobody has 256 'frzzmabs-1'..'frzzzmabs-256'
servers in the same /24  for *anything* user-facing.


You clearly haven't set up webmail farms to handle half a billion accounts
before.  ^_^;

We name our (many thousands of) webmail front end boxes as
webXYYZZ.mail.$site.yahoo.com, so for cluster 3, farm 57, you
end up with a string of hosts all in a row like
web35701.mail.mud.yahoo.com
web35702.mail.mud.yahoo.com
web35703.mail.mud.yahoo.com
web35704.mail.mud.yahoo.com
web35705.mail.mud.yahoo.com
web35706.mail.mud.yahoo.com
web35707.mail.mud.yahoo.com
web35708.mail.mud.yahoo.com
...etc...
Take a look at the reverse DNS for the entire 66.163.178.0/23 subnet;
you'll find that when you're doing things at large scale, you can't really
get away from having sequentially numbered reverse DNS entries all
in a row, exactly as you seem to think "Nobody has".  :/

Matt


Current thread: