nanog mailing list archives
Re: Linux shaping packet loss
From: gordon b slater <gordslater () ieee org>
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 07:05:15 +0000
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 06:38 +0000, gordon b slater wrote:
If 1000 is too high for your kit try pushing it upwards gradually from the default of 100
meh! 6am+insomniac blues for a Gigeth it's more likely to be 1000 already, so push it up to 10000 in stages - you get the idea.
Current thread:
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss, (continued)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss Tony Finch (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss Nathan Ward (Dec 08)
- RE: Linux shaping packet loss Keith Medcalf (Dec 10)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss Brielle Bruns (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss Michael Holstein (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss Chris (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss Simon Horman (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss gordon b slater (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss Bazy (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss gordon b slater (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss gordon b slater (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss Nickola Kolev (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss Chris (Dec 10)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss Michael Holstein (Dec 10)