nanog mailing list archives
Re: Linux shaping packet loss
From: Nathan Ward <nanog () daork net>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 09:48:35 +1300
On 9/12/2009, at 4:47 AM, Tony Finch wrote:
Autoneg is a required part of the gig E specification so you'd only becausing yourself trouble by turning it off. (I don't know if it'll alsobreak automatic MDI/MDI-X (crossover) configuration, for an example of something that's nice to have.)
Yes it will break auto MDI/MDI-X. -- Nathan Ward
Current thread:
- Linux shaping packet loss Chris (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss Bret Clark (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss sthaug (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss Joe Abley (Dec 08)
- RE: Linux shaping packet loss Matlock, Kenneth L (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss sthaug (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss Scott Howard (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss Tony Finch (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss Nathan Ward (Dec 08)
- RE: Linux shaping packet loss Keith Medcalf (Dec 10)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss sthaug (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss Brielle Bruns (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss Michael Holstein (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss Bret Clark (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss Chris (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss Simon Horman (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss gordon b slater (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss Bazy (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss gordon b slater (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss gordon b slater (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss Nickola Kolev (Dec 08)