nanog mailing list archives
Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP
From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 18:01:02 +0100
On 19/08/2009 16:12, Clue Store wrote:
I would like to run an IGP (currently OSPF) to our customers that are multi-homed in a non-mpls environment.
Unless you want your customers to have very substantial control over your internal network, don't use an SPF IGP like ospf or is-is. You really want to use BGP for this and private ASNs are fine - that's what they are there for.
Nick
Current thread:
- OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Clue Store (Aug 19)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Clue Store (Aug 19)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Jack Bates (Aug 19)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Nick Hilliard (Aug 19)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Clue Store (Aug 19)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Marko Milivojevic (Aug 19)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Joe Provo (Aug 20)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Randy Bush (Aug 20)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Clue Store (Aug 19)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Andy Davidson (Aug 20)
- RE: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Ivan Pepelnjak (Aug 20)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Roland Dobbins (Aug 20)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Philip Smith (Aug 20)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Clue Store (Aug 20)
- RE: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Ivan Pepelnjak (Aug 20)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Clue Store (Aug 20)
(Thread continues...)