Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP

[Clue Store <cluestore () gmail com>]

Sorry, not OSPFv3. IPv6 thoughts dancing in my head. OSPF-VRF as most of you
probably interpret.

On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Clue Store <cluestore () gmail com> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I know this has been discussed probably many times on this list, but I was
> looking for some specifics about what others are doing in the following
> situations.
>
> I would like to run an IGP (currently OSPF) to our customers that are
> multi-homed in a non-mpls environment. They are multi-homed with small
> prefixes that are swipped from my ARIN allocations. OSPF has been flaky at
> best under certain conditions and I am thinking of making the move to IS-IS.
> I have also seen others going to private AS and running eBGP. This seems a
> bit much, but if it works, i'd make the move to it as I like bgp the most
> (all of the BGP knobs give me the warm and fuzzies :).
>
> I'd also like to see what folks are using in a MPLS network?? OSPFv3 or
> IS-IS or right to MP-BGP and redist static from the CE to PE???
>
> On and off list are welcome. I'll make a summary after I gather the info.
>
> Thanks,
> Clue