nanog mailing list archives
Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell () ufp org>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:02:13 -0400
I suspect at more than a few companies the "Net Admin" can get a 10 minute slot on the CTO's calendar....in 2042. In the wonderful game of pass it up the food chain it probably looks something like this: Net-Admin: This IPv6 stuff is important, we should already be deploying it full-tilt. Manager: Some IPv6 testing should be reflected in next years budget. Director: I hear IPv6 is the future, but customers just aren't demanding it. VP Network: Humm, maybe I should have read the Network World article on IPv6 rather than the one on Google World Dominance. CTO: *crickets* I think this is a tool to cause everyone in that chain to have to do a lot more communicating up and down, and I think that is a very good thing at many companies, particularly large companies. There is no silver bullet here. There is no one thing that can be done that can make it all better. This is a small, but important step that will be significant to some, but not all companies. To that end I'm glad ARIN has taken it, and hope it is one of many steps that get us to the destination. -- Leo Bicknell - bicknell () ufp org - CCIE 3440 PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests, (continued)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Jo Rhett (Apr 20)
- RE: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Frank Bulk - iName.com (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Chris Owen (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Jo Rhett (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Robert E. Seastrom (Apr 23)
- RE: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Frank Bulk - iName.com (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Jo Rhett (Apr 20)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Carl Ford (Apr 20)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Rich Kulawiec (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests John Curran (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Joel Jaeggli (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Ricky Beam (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Leo Bicknell (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Kevin Graham (Apr 23)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Edward Lewis (Apr 22)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Roger Marquis (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] John Curran (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Chris Owen (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Roger Marquis (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Owen DeLong (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Fred Baker (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Jo Rhett (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Roger Marquis (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] John Curran (Apr 21)