nanog mailing list archives

Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests

From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk () gsp org>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 06:03:43 -0400


If the effort that will go into administering this went instead
into reclaiming IPv4 space that's obviously hijacked and/or being
used by abusive operations, we'd all benefit.

---Rsk

Current thread:

Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests, (continued)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Matthew Moyle-Croft (Apr 20)
  - RE: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Aaron Wendel (Apr 20)
  - Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests David Conrad (Apr 21)
    - Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Joe Greco (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Jo Rhett (Apr 20)
  - RE: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Frank Bulk - iName.com (Apr 21)
    - Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Chris Owen (Apr 21)
    - Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Jo Rhett (Apr 21)
    - Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Robert E. Seastrom (Apr 23)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Carl Ford (Apr 20)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Rich Kulawiec (Apr 21)
  - Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests John Curran (Apr 21)
  - Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Joel Jaeggli (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Ricky Beam (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Leo Bicknell (Apr 21)
  - Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Kevin Graham (Apr 23)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Edward Lewis (Apr 22)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Roger Marquis (Apr 21)
  - Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] John Curran (Apr 21)
    - Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Chris Owen (Apr 21)
    - Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Roger Marquis (Apr 21)

(Thread continues...)