nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP FlowSpec support on provider networks
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 00:54:05 -0400
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 6:38 PM, John Payne <john () sackheads org> wrote:
On Apr 10, 2009, at 4:27 PM, "Fouant, Stefan" <Stefan.Fouant () neustar biz> wrote:Hi folks, I am trying to compile data on which providers are currently supporting BGP Flowspec at their edge, if there are any at all. The few providers I've reached out to have indicated they do not support this and have no intention of supporting this any time in the near future. I'm also curious why something so useful as to have the ability to advertise flow specification information in NLRI and distribute filtering information is taking so long to gain a foothold in the industry...Can you name 3 major vendors who support it? I suspect more providers would
juniper... and when they dropped the IPR stuff other vendors basically walked away :(
offer it if there was vendor support. Last I checked, at least one vendor was fighting mad over the thought of supporting it.
yes :( weee! poilitics!
Current thread:
- BGP FlowSpec support on provider networks Fouant, Stefan (Apr 10)
- Re: BGP FlowSpec support on provider networks John Payne (Apr 10)
- Re: BGP FlowSpec support on provider networks Christopher Morrow (Apr 10)
- Re: BGP FlowSpec support on provider networks Jared Mauch (Apr 11)
- RE: BGP FlowSpec support on provider networks Fouant, Stefan (Apr 11)
- Re: BGP FlowSpec support on provider networks sthaug (Apr 11)
- Re: BGP FlowSpec support on provider networks Christopher Morrow (Apr 10)
- Re: BGP FlowSpec support on provider networks John Payne (Apr 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: BGP FlowSpec support on provider networks Richard A Steenbergen (Apr 10)