nanog mailing list archives
RE: ingress SMTP
From: "Justin D. Scott" <jscott () gravityfree com>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 22:28:07 -0400
iiNet a reasonably sized Aussie ISP has a web page (specifially part of the 'My Account' page) where you can, with a simple check box, choose to have commonly abused ports blocked *for outgoing connections* or not.
That's great, and an excellent solution. Unfortunately many of the larger providers here in the United States are not as enlightened from my experience. Of course, YMMV. -Justin Scott
Current thread:
- Re: Why not go after bots? (was: ingress SMTP), (continued)
- Re: Why not go after bots? (was: ingress SMTP) Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 03)
- RE: Why not go after bots? (was: ingress SMTP) Frank Bulk (Sep 03)
- RE: ingress SMTP Skywing (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP *Hobbit* (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Steven Champeon (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Robert Bonomi (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Alec Berry (Sep 04)
- Re: ingress SMTP Mark Andrews (Sep 04)
- Re: ingress SMTP Alec Berry (Sep 04)
- Re: ingress SMTP Alec Berry (Sep 04)
- RE: ingress SMTP Justin D. Scott (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Mark Foster (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Jeff Kinz (Sep 04)
- Re: ingress SMTP Mark Foster (Sep 04)
- Re: ingress SMTP Jeff Kinz (Sep 04)
- Re: ingress SMTP Simon Waters (Sep 05)
- Re: ingress SMTP Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 05)
- Re: ingress SMTP Mark Foster (Sep 05)
- Re: ingress SMTP Robert E. Seastrom (Sep 10)