nanog mailing list archives

Re: ingress SMTP

From: matthew () sorbs net
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 09:04:36 +1000



----- Original Message -----
From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra () baylink com>
Date: Thursday, September 4, 2008 5:00 am
Subject: Re: ingress SMTP


Does anyone bother to run an MSA on 587 and *not* require 
authentication?



Many can be configured that way (example: Sun One/iPlanet mail server
can).  Whether they are or not depends on the admin.

/ M

Current thread:

RE: Why not go after bots? (was: ingress SMTP), (continued)
- - - RE: Why not go after bots? (was: ingress SMTP) Frank Bulk (Sep 03)
- RE: ingress SMTP Skywing (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP *Hobbit* (Sep 03)
  - Re: ingress SMTP Steven Champeon (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Robert Bonomi (Sep 03)
  - Re: ingress SMTP Alec Berry (Sep 04)
    - Re: ingress SMTP Mark Andrews (Sep 04)
    - Re: ingress SMTP Alec Berry (Sep 04)
- Re: ingress SMTP matthew (Sep 03)
  - RE: ingress SMTP Justin D. Scott (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP matthew (Sep 03)
- ingress SMTP Keith Medcalf (Sep 03)
  - Re: ingress SMTP Mark Foster (Sep 03)
    - Re: ingress SMTP Jeff Kinz (Sep 04)
    - Re: ingress SMTP Mark Foster (Sep 04)
    - Re: ingress SMTP Jeff Kinz (Sep 04)
    - Re: ingress SMTP Simon Waters (Sep 05)
    - Re: ingress SMTP Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 05)
    - Re: ingress SMTP Mark Foster (Sep 05)
    - Re: ingress SMTP Robert E. Seastrom (Sep 10)
    - Re: ingress SMTP Jeff Kinz (Sep 05)

(Thread continues...)