nanog mailing list archives
RE: Google's PUE
From: "Martin Hannigan" <Martin.Hannigan () verneglobal com>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 18:04:44 -0000
Personally, I think only a self-owned DC could get that low. A general purpose DC would have too many inefficiencies since someone like Equinix must have randomly sized cages, routers and servers, custom-built suites, etc. By owning both sides, GOOG gets a boost. But it's still frickin' amazing, IMHO.
I wonder what it cost? :-) -M<
Current thread:
- Google's PUE Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 01)
- RE: Google's PUE Martin Hannigan (Oct 01)
- Re: Google's PUE Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 01)
- Re: Google's PUE Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET (Oct 01)
- Re: Google's PUE Jon Lewis (Oct 01)
- Re: Google's PUE David Andersen (Oct 01)
- Re: Google's PUE David Birnbaum (Oct 01)
- Re: Google's PUE Deepak Jain (Oct 01)
- Re: Google's PUE Marshall Eubanks (Oct 01)
- Re: Google's PUE Andy Grosser (Oct 02)
- Re: Google's PUE Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 01)
- Re: Google's PUE Jean-François Mezei (Oct 01)
- RE: Google's PUE Alex Rubenstein (Oct 01)
- RE: Google's PUE Martin Hannigan (Oct 01)