nanog mailing list archives
Re: Google's PUE
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 14:21:40 -0400
On Oct 1, 2008, at 2:04 PM, Martin Hannigan wrote:
Personally, I think only a self-owned DC could get that low. A general purpose DC would have too many inefficiencies since someone like Equinix must have randomly sized cages, routers and servers, custom-built suites, etc. By owning both sides, GOOG gets a boost. But it's still frickin' amazing, IMHO.I wonder what it cost? :-)
What cost to the environment of not doing it?OK, green hat off. :) Seriously, I doubt GOOG isn't seeing serious savings from this over time. If they weren't why would they do it?
-- TTFN, patrick
Current thread:
- Google's PUE Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 01)
- RE: Google's PUE Martin Hannigan (Oct 01)
- Re: Google's PUE Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 01)
- Re: Google's PUE Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET (Oct 01)
- Re: Google's PUE Jon Lewis (Oct 01)
- Re: Google's PUE David Andersen (Oct 01)
- Re: Google's PUE David Birnbaum (Oct 01)
- Re: Google's PUE Deepak Jain (Oct 01)
- Re: Google's PUE Marshall Eubanks (Oct 01)
- Re: Google's PUE Andy Grosser (Oct 02)
- Re: Google's PUE Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 01)
- Re: Google's PUE Jean-François Mezei (Oct 01)
- RE: Google's PUE Alex Rubenstein (Oct 01)
- RE: Google's PUE Martin Hannigan (Oct 01)
- Re: Google's PUE Daniel Golding (Oct 02)