nanog mailing list archives
Re: Another driver for v6?
From: Steven King <sking () kingrst com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:48:50 -0400
I personally agree with that. Now only if I can convince our management to start work on that. isabel dias wrote:
question - "beginning a small deployment of IPv6 now even if its just for internal usage" Sure! there are plenty of reasons .........most obvious one is to feel confortable about ipv6 --- On Wed, 10/29/08, Steven King <sking () kingrst com> wrote:From: Steven King <sking () kingrst com> Subject: Re: Another driver for v6? To: "Bruce Curtis" <bruce.curtis () ndsu edu> Cc: nanog () nanog org Date: Wednesday, October 29, 2008, 11:32 PM Kind of a side question but we have not implemented IPv6 in our network yet, nor have we made any plans to do this in the near future. Our management does not see a need for it as our customer base is not requesting it at this time. Does anyone see any benefits to beginning a small deployment of IPv6 now even if its just for internal usage? Bruce Curtis wrote:On Oct 29, 2008, at 10:32 AM, Joe Maimon wrote:Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Steven M. Bellovin wrote: They claim they will deploy IPv6 in theirworldwide enterprisenetwork, do away with central based enterprisefirewalls and dohost-to-host IPv6+IPSEC, Active Directorybased certificates forauthentication.You know that windows 2000 was released with thisfunctionality. Itsnothing new and it is not ipv6 specific. Who is using it precisely?Microsoft, on 200,000 computers at the time of thepaper below.http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb735174.aspxWe have a couple of departments using IPsec here andone moreseriously looking at it. (Mainly a matter of findingtime to test andimplement.) Plus there are at least a couple of otherUniversities.http://members.microsoft.com/CustomerEvidence/Search/EvidenceDetails.aspx?EvidenceID=14258&LanguageID=1https://members.microsoft.com/customerevidence/search/EvidenceDetails.aspx?EvidenceID=14205&LanguageID=1And I see a City has been added to the list.http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/casestudy.aspx?casestudyid=4000000161http://www.cu.ipv6tf.org/pdf/v6security_6Sense_Jan2006.pdf--- Bruce Curtisbruce.curtis () ndsu eduCertified NetAnalyst II 701-231-8527 North Dakota State University-- Steve King Cisco Certified Network Associate CompTIA Linux+ Certified Professional CompTIA A+ Certified Professional
-- Steve King Cisco Certified Network Associate CompTIA Linux+ Certified Professional CompTIA A+ Certified Professional
Current thread:
- Another driver for v6? Steven M. Bellovin (Oct 28)
- Re: Another driver for v6? Nathan Ward (Oct 28)
- Re: Another driver for v6? Matthew Kaufman (Oct 28)
- Re: Another driver for v6? Mikael Abrahamsson (Oct 28)
- Re: Another driver for v6? Joe Maimon (Oct 29)
- Re: Another driver for v6? Bruce Curtis (Oct 29)
- Re: Another driver for v6? Steven King (Oct 29)
- Re: Another driver for v6? Nathan Ward (Oct 29)
- Re: Another driver for v6? isabel dias (Oct 29)
- Re: Another driver for v6? Steven King (Oct 29)
- Re: Another driver for v6? Nathan Ward (Oct 29)
- Re: Another driver for v6? Joe Maimon (Oct 29)
- Re: Another driver for v6? David W. Hankins (Oct 29)
- Re: Another driver for v6? Steven M. Bellovin (Oct 29)
- Re: Another driver for v6? Mikael Abrahamsson (Oct 30)
- Re: Another driver for v6? Matthew Moyle-Croft (Oct 30)
- Re: Another driver for v6? Matthew Ford (Oct 30)
- Re: Another driver for v6? Mikael Abrahamsson (Oct 30)
- Re: Another driver for v6? Nathan Ward (Oct 28)
- Re: Another driver for v6? David W. Hankins (Oct 30)
- Re: Another driver for v6? Andy Davidson (Oct 30)
- RE: Another driver for v6? michael.dillon (Oct 30)