nanog mailing list archives

Re: Another driver for v6?


From: Steven King <sking () kingrst com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:32:31 -0400

Kind of a side question but we have not implemented IPv6 in our network
yet, nor have we made any plans to do this in the near future. Our
management does not see a need for it as our customer base is not
requesting it at this time.

Does anyone see any benefits to beginning a small deployment of IPv6 now
even if its just for internal usage?

Bruce Curtis wrote:

On Oct 29, 2008, at 10:32 AM, Joe Maimon wrote:



Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:

They claim they will deploy IPv6 in their worldwide enterprise
network, do away with central based enterprise firewalls and do
host-to-host IPv6+IPSEC, Active Directory based certificates for
authentication.

You know that windows 2000 was released with this functionality. Its
nothing new and it is not ipv6 specific.

Who is using it precisely?

  Microsoft, on 200,000 computers at the time of the paper below.

  http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb735174.aspx

  We have a couple of departments using IPsec here and one more
seriously looking at it.  (Mainly a matter of finding time to test and
implement.)

Plus there are at least a couple of other Universities.

http://members.microsoft.com/CustomerEvidence/Search/EvidenceDetails.aspx?EvidenceID=14258&LanguageID=1


https://members.microsoft.com/customerevidence/search/EvidenceDetails.aspx?EvidenceID=14205&LanguageID=1


  And I see a City has been added to the list.

http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/casestudy.aspx?casestudyid=4000000161




http://www.cu.ipv6tf.org/pdf/v6security_6Sense_Jan2006.pdf


---
Bruce Curtis                         bruce.curtis () ndsu edu
Certified NetAnalyst II                701-231-8527
North Dakota State University



-- 
Steve King

Cisco Certified Network Associate
CompTIA Linux+ Certified Professional
CompTIA A+ Certified Professional



Current thread: