nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Wow
From: Perry Lorier <perry () coders net>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:36:00 +1300
Alain Durand wrote:
On 10/23/08 6:39 PM, "Tony Hain" <alh-ietf () tndh net> wrote:A properly implemented client will do the longest prefix match against that set, so a 6to4 client will go directly to the content provider's 6to4 router, while a native client will take the direct path.Not quite. Say the server has native IPv6 address 2001::1 and 6to4 IPv6 2002::X. Say the client has native IPv6 address 2003::1 and 6to4 IPv6 2002::Y. Longest prefix match will choose 6to4 over native IPv6. Not good.
Not quite. A properly implemented client will use the policy table first which by section 2.1 and 10.3 of RFC 3484 depref's 2002::/16 below 0::/0. It's only if two addresses are very similar (as far as the OS can determine) that the "longest match" rule comes into play.
You should also be able to configure your operating system to depref or pref source/destination addresses as local site policy requires (avoiding tunnels, preferring v4 for some sites, using 6to4 for other sites, and avoiding v6 all together for others and so on).
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Wow, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Wow Stephen Sprunk (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 Wow Nathan Ward (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 Wow Daniel Senie (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 Wow Nathan Ward (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 Wow Mikael Abrahamsson (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 Wow Nathan Ward (Oct 12)
- RE: IPv6 Wow Tony Hain (Oct 23)
- Re: IPv6 Wow Alain Durand (Oct 23)
- Re: IPv6 Wow Mark Andrews (Oct 23)
- Re: IPv6 Wow Joe Abley (Oct 23)
- Re: IPv6 Wow Perry Lorier (Oct 23)
- Re: IPv6 Wow Carlos Friacas (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 Wow Mikael Abrahamsson (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 Wow Nathan Ward (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 Wow David Malone (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Wow Kevin Day (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 Wow Mohacsi Janos (Oct 13)