nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Wow
From: Stephen Sprunk <stephen () sprunk org>
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 15:53:13 -0500
Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
This brings up an interesting question, should we stop announcing our 6to4 relays outside of Europe? Is there consensus in the business how this should be done? I have heard opinions both ways.
I can understand why some folks would say stop, but unfortunately Europe has the closest public 6to4 relays to the US, and our own providers don't seem to want to put any up. That means 6to4 will break for a great many folks who _are_ trying to use IPv6 (like developers trying to get ahead of the curve and make sure their apps don't break when the transition finally happens) but whose providers haven't clued in yet.
(My traceroutes to 192.88.99.1 have a next-to-last hop in Amsterdam, and I'm on one of the largest ISPs in the US, which apparently hasn't figured out 6to4, much less native IPv6.)
S
Current thread:
- IPv6 Wow Max Clark (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 Wow William Pitcock (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 Wow Nathan Ward (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 Wow Mikael Abrahamsson (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 Wow Stephen Sprunk (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 Wow Nathan Ward (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 Wow Daniel Senie (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 Wow Nathan Ward (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 Wow Mikael Abrahamsson (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 Wow Nathan Ward (Oct 12)
- RE: IPv6 Wow Tony Hain (Oct 23)
- Re: IPv6 Wow Alain Durand (Oct 23)
- Re: IPv6 Wow Mark Andrews (Oct 23)
- Re: IPv6 Wow Joe Abley (Oct 23)
- Re: IPv6 Wow Perry Lorier (Oct 23)
- Re: IPv6 Wow Nathan Ward (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 Wow William Pitcock (Oct 12)